Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (112084)	8/20/2003 7:09:48 AM
From: Sig	Read Replies (1) of 281500

<<But I don't see Annan showing his "backside" in Iraq after such a major attack. It would suggest that no future UN "nation building" operation could possibly succeed. >>> Not a chance- per Annan the UN stays . Changes were needed, this is the trigger. And still the US must hold the fort while the UN debates its response and its future. And for one time in history, the US has the Military capabilities if they are required in some way. It seldom works to combine two organizations, like the UN for resolutions and the Nato for enforcement so what is the alternative for implanting teeth in the UN? Any good ideas that would not set the Western ideals right up against those of the East? Sig

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next