SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lane3 who wrote (72674)8/20/2003 6:02:57 PM
From: The Philosopher  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
Okay. Here's at least one example.

If a child on the playground incessantly cheats at games, I think it is acceptable for the other children not only to refuse to play with her, but to taunt her with "chater, cheater" names.

If a child on the playground tells frequent lies, I think it is acceptable for children to taunt him with "liar, liar, pants on fire" chants.

These are behaviors that the children involved have for some reason chosen to adopt. Adults may want to try to understand why and help the child change his or her behavior. But other children have, I think, the right to response with taunting and names as well as with refusal to play with the child, so that the child will learn that there is a peer group social cost, as well as an adult social cost, to such behavior.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext