Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hawkmoon who wrote (112288)	8/22/2003 9:49:50 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) of 281500

Hi Hawkmoon; Re: "I ain't the one advocating destroying entire nations in the name of Allah." Those guys are genocidal maniacs too. My vote is to give you a gun, send you over there to kill the other genocidal maniacs, and to leave the US the hell out of it. I don't want to be involved in your crusade. Re: "WOULD YOU RATHER WE HAD INVADED SAUDI ARABIA???" Saudi Arabia would be a tougher target than Iraq to conquer, and an equally tough country to pacify. An invasion there would also result in failure. Re: "They ARE complicit in 9/11, or at elements of the Saudi Royal family are." (1) You have little proof of this. (2) The Saudi Royal family is huge. With that many people, and with the way that the Arabs love bin Laden, it would be a miracle if there were not any supporters among those *thousands* of members. The fact that attacking Saudi Arabia would have made more sense than attacking Iraq does not make attacking Saudi Arabia a sensible thing, LOL. -- Carl

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next