SARS - what next? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SARS - what next?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ilaine who wrote (683)	8/23/2003 8:40:25 PM
From: Henry Niman	of 1070

Well there is much more to the SARS story in Surrey, BC. The NY Times is definitely trailing on this one. There hasn't been any rational explanation about the 750 nt of exact match to SARS CoV. Just comments that finding OC43 sequences in some patients somehow negates the SARS CoV data. The data is either real or artifact. It has nothing to do with OC43 unless the two viruses have recombined, in which case there is the potential for an even greater catastrophe. The spin in Canada is at record levels. It will be interesting to see what happens scientifically and if the media asks Canada and WHO some real questions. Last time I look, Free Republic was totally clueless.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next