Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: LindyBill who wrote (5758)	8/24/2003 9:33:53 AM
From: KonKilo	Read Replies (1) of 793640

SC: There is another, hidden, objective LB: And what would that be? We don't know, its hidden. <g> Following the money is usually a good indicator, though. To wit, the Administration says Iraq is critical in the fight against terror, but does not adequately fund or man our mission there. Hmmm. Bush needs and asks for additional troops from other nations but refuses to cede authority and decision-making to gain said troops. Hmmm. Why does he so much want to hold onto our sole authority there? Why not share the nation-building chores with the world? It makes sense to bring other nations in, unless...hmmm...unless he does not wish to share, what? (Sorry, thinking out loud here). What does Iraq have that Bush does not wish to share? Sand? Artifacts? Rubble? Oil? No-bid reconstruction projects? Just speculation on my part, trying to comprehend the incomprehensible.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next