SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (112737)8/25/2003 5:57:45 PM
From: Sig  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
<<My guess is, the decision-makers thought our troops would be stumbling over hundreds of WMD (after being shelled with chemical weapons as they approached Baghdad), so the evidence for WMD would be obvious and overwhelming, and there would be no need to search for it >>>

Thats pretty good guessing.
We had planned and prepared for war- a real one. For 10000 casualties, for blown bridges, for 800 burning oil wells, for suicide attackers. For a need for reinforcements and months of battle. For aircraft loses. For gas attacks
For months of fighting in 120 heat.
We had plans A, B, C, and D.
Then Saddam had to spoil it all by failing to have a backup communication system with his armies and lost all control over their actions, with mass confusion and collapse as a result.
Does anyone remember or appeciate today the lives, the bridges, the oil fields saved by General Franks actions ? Only those in the Military, it seems..
Wonder how many days we have to allow for the next War, before having to implement a peace plan.?
Five days, maybe a couple of weeks?
Sig
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext