SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bilow who wrote (112680)8/25/2003 8:21:08 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
I agree with you, which is why I wanted to leave Saddam in there. He was a useful buffer to Iranian power, and until we cut him down to size (and then kept him in a box) 12 years ago, he was a useful buffer to Saudi power.

Useful just like Somoza, Pinochet, and possibly the Shah?

You see... I obviously have a fundamental disagreement with you about the efficacy of maintaining Saddam in power. For one, it absolutely justifies the prevalent Iraqi belief that Saddam was a "puppet" of the US, and secondly, that we were responsible for their suffering by refusing to unhold those various UN resolutions.

And will remember this post of yours the next time I hear any criticism by you of US support for these dictators, and the ultimate blowback that US foreign policy suffered as a result.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News