Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (112772)	8/25/2003 8:33:53 PM
From: KonKilo	Read Replies (2) of 281500

Check Jacob's guessing. Makes a great deal of sense. Particularly since I think this occurs before the Bush folk knew they were going to need this kind of info. I usually agree with Jacob, but I'm not so sure about this one...doesn't smell right. We knew who met there, and what their purpose was. And yet no member of any US governmental agency expressed the slightest interest in saving what was in those weapons programs documents, leaving them lay, Iraqi police or not? Even if we expected to trip over WMDs on the sidewalks of Baghdad, wouldn't we have had an interest in the contents of those papers, for the names of the people running said programs, if nothing else? Sorry to be so cynical, but I think I'm right about this one.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next