Idea Of The Day Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (44424)	8/27/2003 12:39:38 PM
From: Thomas M.	Read Replies (2) of 50167

No the truce ended with the bombing that Hamas claimed credit for. Israel then retaliated by killing the Hamas leader. Apparently Hamas want's people to think that if they are attacking and Israel is not then there is a truce, and if Israel fights back then it is causing the end of the truce... Why do you feel the need to lie about this? In reality, Israel broke the truce on August 8. Hamas retaliated once, but then agreed to renew the truce. Israel struck again on August 14, Hamas retaliated but did not call off the truce. Finally, after Israel's 3rd attack on August 21, Hamas decided to call off the truce. gush-shalom.org Iqbal was correct in his skepticism of the cease-fire, because: <<< . . . During this six-week period of "relative quiet," however, some 17 Palestinians were killed and at least 59 injured by Israeli occupation soldiers and settlers . . . >>> vhttp://www.fair.org/press-releases/relative-calm.html Tom

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next