Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: GST who wrote (113080)	8/27/2003 9:30:09 PM
From: Brumar89	Read Replies (1) of 281500

..we pointedly insulted the inspectors and denegraded them at every opportunity, declared ourselves to be unilateralist as a matter of policy, .. What are you talking about? American support, including explicit military threat, was the only reason inspectors ever got into Iraq. We did everything we could to assist and enable them to do their job. Except give Iraq an unlimited amount of time to resist inspections and a complete accounting. As it was they got more than 12 years. The final showdown with Saddam should have happened in 1998. The Clinton administration knew it but was too inept to get the job done. “The hard fact is that so long as Saddam remains in power, he threatens the well-being of his people, the peace of the region, the security of the world.” Bill Clinton 1998 Name a prominent member of the Clinton administration or Democratic Congressional leader and I'm pretty sure I can find similar quotes from them all. Regime change has been American policy on Iraq since 1998. That was the year the Iraq Liberation Act was passed - 202 Republicans and 157 Democrats voted for it in Congress.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next