Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TigerPaw who wrote (26644)	8/28/2003 10:59:13 AM
From: stockman_scott	Read Replies (2) of 89467

I am not someone who thinks that oil is the primary motive for the administration's course in Iraq. However, there is no question that Iraq has become, for certain people, a fantastically lucrative venture. Mr. Bremer's latest appropriation suggestions underscore this nicely, and I wonder if some of the administration's recalcitrance might be ascribed to simple conflicts of interest -- if the people who have their ear might also have a significant stake in keeping international community, and the ostensible opening of future contracts to competitive international bidding, at bay. What does everyone think the effects of giving the United Nations a lead role in Iraq would be upon the granting of contracts, both for oil and reconstruction services, to American companies -- specifically, to Bush adminstration donors and cronies? Has anyone analyzed this? I feel like I haven't read anything dealing specifically with that, though it might have just slipped under my radar. Posted by Brandon Keim at August 27, 2003 10:06 PM dailykos.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next