SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: xcr600 who wrote (113347)8/29/2003 1:38:46 PM
From: Nadine Carroll  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Correct. But I want to know the connection prior to the war

From what I've read, the terrorist organizations link to each other in a kind of loose network. Both Al Qaeda and Saddam influenced pieces of this network, though they didn't work directly together. Of course, US war on Iraq was one of OBL's chief grievances. Other points of commonality:

1) Saddam trained Islamist terrorists at Salman Pak
2) Abu Niddal was in Baghdad
3) Iraqi intelligence gave money & orders to Ansar al Islam in eastern Kurdistan, an Al Qaeda allianced group.
4) Saddam paid $300,000 to Al Zawahiri in 1998, just when Al Qaeda acquired Al Zawahiri's Muslim Brotherhood

Quite enough connection to lead intelligence officers to conclude that Saddam & al Qaeda allianced groups could coordinate against the common enemy, the US.

Or was the plan to attack Iraq and lure AL Qaeda into the country to "trap" them?

No, I think that just happened. As Tom Friedman says, the terrorists know that they're fighting the Big One. It's also true that if they're there, then they're not here, plotting another 9/11.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext