SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (113349)8/29/2003 2:06:12 PM
From: xcr600  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
Hmm.. note quite enough there for me to justify 4bln a month down the drain. But it makes a great veil for this administration to further expand it's tentacles. btw, why would Saddam support an Iranian backed group? Doesn't make sense, does it, considering they are enemies. Niddal in Baghdad? so what? there are 5million other people in Baghdad as well.

Salman Pak info comes from former defectors. Circumstantial evidence.

OBL objecting to the war? What else would you expect him to say? That's the same pathetic proof this adminstration tried to pass onto the American public. Surely they could do better than that..lol

btw, should we have invaded Saudi Arabia first? The evidence sure appears to be more damming in their case.

Obviously,imo the arguements here would never hold up in a court of law. Probably explains the lack of global support in this campaign.

Thanks for your thoughts and the Debka article. I missed that one. Very interesting.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News