SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (4711)	8/30/2003 8:23:36 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!	Read Replies (1) of 5315

Hi Chris, Of course, you are correct. I was merely trying to keep things as simple as possible so everyone could have a basic understanding of the applicable laws. As an attorney, you'd know far better than the average person what the rest of the story entails. I'm not taking sides here, either with Bux or Matt, other than that, as Matt contended, SI is not the proper venue to resolve any dispute from I-Hub. I'm also not familiar with the IDCC thread on I-Hub, nor the poster that was alleged/presumably "attacked" by Bux's "offending" post. While I think Bux could have made his point(s) without specifically identifying the other poster (even though everyone else would have known who he was referring to in the post), that's so much water under the bridge now. Bux should now know that he must take the high road if he wants to continue to post. The road he takes must be higher than the other thread participants, which means he must turn the other cheek at times, and censor his own posts, using better judgement. It may not seem fair, but thems the apples in his basket right now. KJC

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next