Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (6359)	8/30/2003 8:58:00 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (1) of 793820

This is precisely why I don't wish to debate it. The whole business of banning Lerner is arguable but I don't care to argue it until and unless it becomes a relevant issue. Then I'll do the homework. As for whether Answer is/was anti-semitic is easy for you to call, difficult for me. You thought any serious criticisms of Israeli policy were anti-semitic. That would, obviously, lead you to think Answer was anti-semitic. I don't agree with that. Perhaps Answer is/was anti-semitic but definitely not because they were opposed, even vehemently opposed to Israeli policy. But if you did that, you might find it difficult to keep up the pose that every criticism against a left-wing anti-war group is unwarranted McCarthyism. Very, very cheap shot.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next