SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2 Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: The Philosopher who wrote (4711)	8/31/2003 9:36:38 AM
From: SI Bob	Read Replies (3) of 5315

Keep in mind that iHub is not "pay to post". Payment there enables premium features, which should remain intact whether suspended or not (if not, I need to revisit the source code and fix that) and the only posting-related things that subscription enables is an increase in daily posting ability to effectively unlimited quantity and location, with suspension clamping down only on location. Personally, I don't know why Bux is suspended over there and don't much care beyond academic curiosity. I suspect if he asks over there, he'll be told. Matt won't "answer to" his admin decisions here just as I won't answer to my admin decisions on this site over at iHub. As for SI's subscription being construed as a contract to allow posting, that's debatable, and apparently the previous legal department didn't want to see it debated in court. I feel no such reservations. But the model will change to be more like iHub's, with certain differences. The quality is higher here and I don't want to dilute it the way it can happen when you fling the doors open.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next