Foreign Affairs Discussion Group Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (113577)	9/1/2003 11:52:43 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 281500

John, You are two for two with great article postings this morning. Assuming Kagan is right, how do we pay for the next division(since we are alreaady deficited out) without cancelling out the bush tax cuts? ANS: A war surtax? How about a X% surcharge on the actual amount taxed? That would guarantee maintenance of progressivity. For instance a low earner who payed $2000 in taxes would have a $200 surcharge. A middle earner with $20,000 in taxes four pay $2000 and so on. Politically Bush could justify this as purely a temporary war tax and it would not change the structural reform of the tax cut for his supply side supporters. Then we can get on with the military spending along with some of Kyrosi's infrastructure investments free of the politics of tax cuts. Just an idea. Mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next