SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (451309)9/1/2003 6:24:41 PM
From: DavesM  Read Replies (1) of 769668
 
Lizzie,

You are simply wrong. There are more people working in California, than ever - also more unemployed (July 2003 - 16.6 million employed and 1.2 million unemployed, Jan 2001 - 16.1 million employed and .9 million unemployed).

calmis.cahwnet.gov

Further, while not exactly having a progressive tax structure, CA is not exactly regressive either.

"California has one of the least-regressive state and local tax systems in the nation, thanks largely to its highly progressive income tax, according to a new study by the Institute on Taxation and Economic Policy.

The study compares state and local tax systems in all 50 states...Only four states require their richest residents to pay as much of their income in taxes as middle-class families. The least regressive is Delaware, followed by Montana, Vermont and California... The study published last week calculated state and local taxes -- including income, sales, excise and property taxes -- as a percentage of family income for people in various income brackets in each state..."

sfgate.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext