SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: lorne who wrote (113655)9/2/2003 4:37:30 PM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
You're in denial.
Here are the possibilities:
Prior to the war(after 1998)
1) Iraq had WMDs(Bush said that)
2) Iraq didn't have WMDs(Blix said that no conlusion could be made in favor of either 1) or 2))
After the war
1) Iraq has WMDs(Bush has wavered on that one)
2)Iraq doesn't have WMDs(Well maybe they are buried someplace according to Lorne)

Like it or not the UN managed to get rid of a large number of WMDs, maybe all of them. Or have you forgotten that prior to the Bush II war it was a UN inspection operation. Who got rid of them if not the UN because they are not there.

Now, with 3-4 times the number of inspectors and free access to all the sites which had WMDs(according to the CIA and others) no WMDs have been found.

And meanwhile Al-Qaeda continues its murderous ways.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News