What you're dismissing isn't "conspiracy", but what looks like proof of criminal acts by gov't officials. This is a simple historical document from the National Archives. Perhaps you can clarify your objection.
I'm sorry, but I have to say its ironic you would dismiss the issue by claiming that "the Kennedy brothers asked for it", certainly a ghostly conspiracy without documentation or links, unworthy of the thread header.
It's a bad thing to subvert the language and attempt to jam inconvenient data into the word "conspiracy", rather than facing simple facts. Not all criminal acts by gov't officials can be dismissed by such semantic nonsense.
Forget the "conspiracy". These are criminal acts, pure and simple. Tell me how this was not treason, regardless.
If you accept the document as accurate, it opens up a can of worms, and means our gov't is not the trustworthy entity we have believed. That's the point of the post, and a question of vast importance.
If you don't believe it is accurate, then it is worthwhile, certainly to me and I'm sure to many others, to make that case.
This goes to the heart of our Republic. |
