Why don't you respond to this?
Because it wasn't posted to me, and I didn't notice it. I don't read every individual post on this (or many other) thread, but if you'd like me to read and comment on it, I'll be happy to tomorrow.
Too much information for you?
Given that I haven't read it yet, I wouldn't assert as to its information content. And any representations as to "information" carry a particularly cutting irony coming from you:
Message 19207883
Message 19263086
Message 19263284
Message 19263294
You're allergic to evidence of corruption in our government?
I have no idea how you'd reach an odd conclusion like that, but as a libertarian I'm interested in, and dedicated to, seeking out verifiable corruption and waste in government. Not, as you and your fellow inmates seem to be addicted to, constructing conspiracy theories in order to explain away uncertainties or buttress nonsensical but expedient political positions.
Also ironically, you...with a pronounced, continually demonstrated lack of rigidity in reasoning...and no demand for credible documentation to support conjecture...serve, if nothing else, as more of an enabler of government and its attendant corruption by dwelling on laughable fantasies rather than verifiable, relevant topics.
LPS5 |
