SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: American Spirit who wrote (452506)9/4/2003 1:08:42 PM
From: Vitas  Read Replies (1) of 769670
 
No wonder you are so confused. You have no idea what the issues are.

The issue was not "finding" WMD. The issue was whether Saddam could prove to the satisfaction of the U.N. that he had destroyed the WMD which he had.

All he had to do is on December 8th, 2002, when he filed his report to the U.N., was provide evidence. He did not comply at that time.

In the first week of March, Blix explicitly reported to the U.N. that Saddam had not complied with U.N. 1441 as of that date.

Now ask yourself why would Saddam not comply if he really didn't have any WMD? Maybe he was playing hide the missile. He had 4 months to do so.

Chile and 3 weeks later is irrelevant. FRANCE said that it would not vote for the second Bush resolution was preparing UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.

Get it? France is the one at fault for the diplomatic process failing.

There were a series of FACTS involved, in a specific timeline, which led to the decison to invade. This is clear to anyone who wants to pay attention.

The invasion is clearly not a waste. Saddam is gone. And no one, expect perhaps you, wants to reinstate him.

The rewards will flow back to us many fold, over time, once Iraq establishes democracy.

The terrorist activity that has arisen alone proves that the invasion was necessary.

Please get your facts right before you libel our President. So far all you have done is show that you cannot function rationally. I am sure that Kerry would be thrilled to know that you enthusiastically endorse him.

-lol-
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News