SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (73899)9/4/2003 5:09:34 PM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
The classic situation is one in which the women seems uncertain, says no, responds to further advances, breaks it off again, and, after some further back and forth, seems to agree to the sex in the face of further aggressive advances, by ceasing to resist. Often, both parties are young and drunk, and rarely does the guy do more than press himself against her. Under current definitions of "violence or the threat of violence", his sexual aggressiveness might be considered rape, but I would not call it so. Again, I do not mean that he should not be liable for some sort of sexual assault, if he penetrates without permission, but I would say that what had gone on fell short of true rape, and amounted to confusion and aggressiveness, which is heavily associated with male sexuality.........
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext