SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 226.05+1.2%Nov 14 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (7073)9/7/2003 8:30:20 PM
From: Sam Citron  Read Replies (1) of 25522
 
I think there is no there there anymore [in India].

If you are referring to pbs.org
then I disagree.

Which brings us back to India and offshoring. So IBM and a number of other companies will send jobs to India. Profits will rise, but no head counts will drop. Head count will rise, in fact, because the heads are so much cheaper. Productivity for these offshoring companies will not rise. It will fall. It will fall simply because of the added overhead to support those longer information supply lines. And service to customers will not improve at all.

I understand the wish to preserve these jobs in the USA, but Cringely's argument fails to convince me. The basic fact remains that India desperately needs the money and has the engineering talent. So as they develop their infrastructure such as their "telecom parks", they will get the job done more efficiently than anywhere else on earth. What do you expect when Indian kids who can't get in to the Indian Institutes of Technology (IIT) are using Stanford and MIT as their safe schools?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext