SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Those Damned Democrat's

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: calgal who wrote (1449)9/10/2003 11:28:31 PM
From: calgal  Read Replies (1) of 1604
 
An ounce of prevention

While terrorists may be pouring over manuals in an effort to stage a biological attack on America that could make September 11 pale by comparison, Congress has failed to muster enough votes to pass Project Bioshield, which would provide a measure of prevention against that eventuality. Project Bioshield would authorize about $6 billion in spending for the development and procurement of treatments against potential biological agents. Private companies are currently unwilling to invest in therapies for which there might not be buyers in the absence of a bioterrorism incident. Project Bioshield would change that by guaranteeing them the sure government procurement market for successfully developed countermeasures, such as cures for smallpox or therapies against plague.
The House passed its version of Project Bioshield, H.R. 2122, by a 421-2 vote in July. While the Senate Health, Labor, Education and Pensions Committee passed a version of the measure in March, it has made little headway since then. Sen. Robert Byrd has been the primary reason for the delay, repeatedly blocking the measure over concerns over its mandatory funding mechanism. To alleviate those concerns, the committee chairman, Sen. Judd Gregg, along with Sen. Edward Kennedy introduced a replacement bill, S. 1504, just before the August recess. The funding measures established in the original version of the bill are still there, but the mechanism is slightly different — instead of being mandatory, the measures are discretionary. But they are only subject to change by a supermajority of 60 senators.
The House version of the bill sets up a reserve fund from which the executive branch could draw dollars. Congress would still retain some control of the money, since it would be designated as discretionary spending. In July, President Bush acquiesced to H.R. 2122's funding mechanism, and Mr. Byrd continues to insist on that mechanism.
The delay must end. Project Bioshield could well have a deterrent effect, because terrorists may come to understand that it is futile to target America with biological weapons for which there are known treatments. The measure is also likely to have the added benefit of encouraging development of better treatments for infectious diseases that are currently ravaging developing countries. Surely, Messrs. Gregg and Kennedy can find 58 more senators to vote for the protection offered by Project Bioshield.


washingtontimes.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext