Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Neocon who wrote (74400)	9/11/2003 9:12:49 AM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 82486

On the contrary, it is his business if the client is turned on. Perhaps we're having a terminology problem. I had in mind that the client quietly found the massage pleasing in a way that had sexual overtones. Which is not the same thing as, er, conspicuously turned on as in ejaculating all over the massage table. The latter, of course, would be the business of the therapist. The former, I think, is not. The latter is an unacceptable sexual behavior issue. I already stipulated behavior. Do you think that, say, a woman lying there quietly fantasizing about knights in shining armor as she is being massaged is any of the therapist's business. Or is she only allowed to think about what she's going to fix for dinner? And is it reasonable for him to turn her away on the chance that she might think about something other than dinner menus?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next