SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (7625)9/11/2003 2:42:15 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) of 793799
 
That statement that there is no doubt Sharon's policies are bankrupt is simply another way to say that the stated aim, which is to increase the security of the Israelis, that aim has failed. They are less secure.

As for your point about both sides wanting peace, I'm not convinced Sharon does nor am I convinced that Arafat does. But I am convinced that the bulk of both the Israeli and Palestinian populations do. The problem is that the direction Sharon has taken only increases the anger among Palestinians, who retaliate, which increases the anger among Israelis. And so forth. Yes, I know you reject that characterization of the dynamics, the one that starts with Sharon. And you wish to place it on the Palestinians. Stop Hamas et al and then we'll negotiate has been the cry of your kinds of argument. Not only is it not working but the Israelis are less secure as a result.

I was heartened to read the portion of the Friedman essay which noted there were still voices in Israel that objected to Sharon's policies.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News