Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TimF who wrote (74637)	9/12/2003 7:53:12 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (2) of 82486

Why a different result or different desired result for the two categories? Message 19300620 More generally you could make an exception for personal service providers who's service requires touching but who are not considered medical personnel. How anyone you pay, people who often touch you as they put change in your hand? We wouldn't want any sparks setting fire to those greenbacks. <g> I think you'd have a tough time drawing a bright line between a masseur and a medical service provider. Might be feasible, though. You might also have some problem with massage therapists who fancy themselves medical professionals. The therapist lobby might work against the exception. I had a facial at a spa once where the woman was very proud of her license to do "extractions," which typically are done by a dermatologist. I think she would be miffed. Lotta trouble cutting out an exception for this guy...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next