SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (114613)9/13/2003 5:43:51 AM
From: Noel de Leon  Read Replies (1) of 281500
 
"It'll be a secret test, as a failed pre-announced test would be a big "loss of face", and an invitation for the U.S. to invade quickly (in the window of opportunity before a successful test)."

A failed test is highly unlikely, a primitive device is all it takes. Nothing I've read has indicated that there were failed tests in the Manhattan project although I could be mistaken. Besides which my experience with South Korean physics students(PhD candidates) says that the brain power is there and may well be in North Korea. Invitations could be sent out 24-48 hours before the test. The point is that a credible WMD threat is all that keeps Bush from attacking. The Iraq case is still operative, disarm them and then attack. The Pakistan case is also operative, Pakistan has nuclear WMDs, but is not a member of the "Axis of Evil"(yet) nor were they prevented from getting them by previous administrations(Reagan, Bush I, Clinton).

More over I doubt that the US has enough conventional ground and air forces to prevent a destruction of South Korea by conventional North Korean forces.

One can ask why did US administrations "let" Pakistan and India, among others, develop nuclear WMDs?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext