Politics for Pros- moderated Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JohnM who wrote (8226)	9/16/2003 11:36:04 AM
From: michael97123	Read Replies (1) of 793794

Would you agree that a democratic court would be guilty of the same charge? By the way, I think it was the Florida court that was blatantly political while the SC followed established law and custom in making their decision in Florida. As for CA, I have no problem with what the CA court decided. If the machines are to be replaced in march, we can wait I guess. The problem though would be what to do with a governor who was corrupt under the CA system and was a republican?? I suspect the Appeals court would have a different decision for that one. And i think the USSC would have ruled the same if the bush/gore issues were reversed. mike

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next