SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: michael97123 who wrote (8230)9/16/2003 11:58:16 AM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (3) of 793794
 
Michael,

Regardless of what you believe, the Florida court's decisions were consistent with its previous decisions in this area and the US Supreme Court was wildly inconsistent in the one key area, the earlier preference of most of the rep appointed judges to defer to state courts, state rights, etc. That led to a widespread decision that the inconsistency was a political one, reps voting for a rep president. That same perception is around about this California decision.

I'm not arguing whether they were only political or not. I'm arguing that we may well be moving into a different, less acceptable political culture in which we say judicial decisions are only political, ho hum.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News