SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : America Under Siege: The End of Innocence
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: DeplorableIrredeemableRedneck who wrote (23899)9/16/2003 10:20:50 PM
From: ChinuSFO  Read Replies (2) of 27666
 
Hey Darren, this is no news. We knew this long back. Musharraf himself had a hand in killing Daniel Pearl. And it was Rumsfeld who during his visit to Pakistan in Dec. 2002, attended Musharraf's cabinet meeting a personally delivered a warning to Pakistan.

And why do you think they did not do to Pakistan what they did to Iraq. Why did not do the nation building in Afghanistan similar to what they are doing in Iraq. The answer is simple: both Pakistan and Afghanistan do not have oil. Don't you think that Bush had a bigger reason to march into Pakistan than into Iraq? If he had told the US troops to continue into Pakistan from Afghanistan, the Indian troops would have sealed off the eastern borders and Osama would be in custody by now. But Bush needed the oil more than he wanted Osama. So he ordered his troops westward from Afghanistan into Iraq to pursue oil for his oil buddies in Texas instead of eastward into India to pursue Osama for his people in the US who elected him.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News