SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Applied Materials No-Politics Thread (AMAT)
AMAT 275.13+3.0%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lizzie Tudor who wrote (7179)9/17/2003 8:58:02 AM
From: Kirk ©  Read Replies (1) of 25522
 
Did Tom Kurlak turn bearish on the group lately?

I try and archive these guys. (I'd sure like some help posting their opinions somewhere on Suite101 so we can do this search and get more results as I miss many.)

Search for "Tom Kurlac" for the past yr.
suite101.com

suite101.com

Date: October 31, 2002
Subject: Here a bear, there a bear, everywhere a bear, bear....

From bear #1 Fleckenstein,

"...A Priori Acid Test: I did receive a handful of emails during the day about a piece penned by Tom Kurlak on RealMoney. My only comment to the piece is that while many people are trying to make the argument that this is the bottom yet again, valuations for some of the big-cap semiconductors like Intel (INTC:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) (INTC) and Applied Materials (AMAT:Nasdaq - news - commentary - research - analysis) are about three times what they have been at prior troughs. One would think that after the biggest bubble in the history of the world, we might see "sub-trough" valuations. But even if we return only to the low valuations of past cycles, what we're seeing today cannot possibly pass for those kinds of levels.

Level-Headed Advice: Meanwhile, it's not my place to give personal advice to people, and I generally don't do this, but given where the economy looks to me to be headed, I would think that sometime in the next week, between now and the FOMC meeting, the stock market will have seen its best levels. So, people who are overexposed to stocks might want to use the next four or five sessions, plus or minus, to lighten up. I simply cannot believe the market does not have unfinished business on the downside.


So it appears that Fleckenstein thought 3 weeks after THE BOTTOM (Oct 9, 2002) was the best levels the market would see AND he implied that Tom Kurlac had called a bottom.

Going back 2 yrs:
suite101.com

We find Cramer mentions Kurlak while calling his sector overvalued:

Chalk this day's bearish tone up to that now-hallowed group. And hope -- even though I don't like hope in the equation -- that one day we will not all be hostage to the whims of the analysts who follow this overrated, overhyped, overvalued sector.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext