SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Doug R who wrote (460344)9/17/2003 11:27:18 AM
From: Skywatcher  Read Replies (2) of 769670
 
Cheney in Wonderland
Los Angeles Times | Editorial

Tuesday 16 September 2003

Vice President Dick Cheney has long acted as though the best defense is a good offense, no
matter what the damage to truth or common sense. It was Cheney who CIA analysts say personally
pressured them to deliver worst-case estimates about Iraqi capabilities and then declared in July that
"it would have been irresponsible in the extreme" not to have acted on those very CIA estimates. Even
so, Cheney, in commenting about Iraq on Sunday during a rare television appearance, broke new
ground. He not only defended the Bush administration's record in rebuilding Iraq but he upheld
sweeping, unproven claims about Saddam Hussein's connections to terrorism.

On Aug. 26, 2002, Cheney announced to the Veterans of Foreign Wars that "simply stated, there is
no doubt that Saddam Hussein now has weapons of mass destruction," and in mid-March he declared
that U.S. troops would be "greeted as liberators." Since then, no weapons of mass destruction have
been found and American troops face up to 17 attacks a day. Administration officials like Defense
Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld and his deputy, Paul D. Wolfowitz, have retreated from many of their
prewar assertions. Rumsfeld declared in a March 30 interview about weapons of mass destruction that
"they're in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south, and north somewhat," but on
May 27, before the Council on Foreign Relations, he said, "I don't know the answer." Similarly,
Wolfowitz was humbled before the Senate Armed Services Committee last week when Sen. Carl Levin
(D-Mich.) confronted him over his declaration in March that Iraqi oil would allow economic recovery to
finance itself. The best that Wolfowitz could do was: "as large as these costs are, they're still small
compared to just the economic price that the attacks of Sept. 11 inflicted. "

Cheney seems stuck in a time warp. He asserted "major success, major progress" in Iraq, and that
Americans were being welcomed as "liberators." He claimed that the Iraqi government "had a
relationship with Al Qaeda that stretched back through most of the decade of the '90s," a more
sweeping time frame than others in the administration have ventured. Those in the administration who
seek help from Europe and elsewhere can only hope that Cheney's speech is seen as something for
domestic consumption, a pep talk for the public that is footing the bill.

But voters can be touchy. The longer that top officials peddle rosy scenarios, the more resentful the
audience will be when the pep talks no longer work.

CC
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext