Sharks in the Septic Tank Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: one_less who wrote (75011)	9/18/2003 2:53:22 PM
From: Lane3	Read Replies (1) of 82486

OK, so he has the belief that the practice of massaging potential (by virtue of gender and sexual orientation)sexual partners* is harmful*. Is that correct? I'm assuming that "potential sexual partners" is the criterion. Although maybe not because then he would be massaging lesbians without risk. So just what is the criterion? **And with regard to harmful, harmful to whom or what? Let's try to pin this belief down specifically. Based on this belief, then the stand he is taking is to broadly speak up and educate the world that it's harmful and get the common practice changed? Or is his stand confined to refusing inappropriate (per his belief) clients in his own practice? The risk is both social opprobrium and legal, correct? His conscience bothered him because the conventions of society seem to be to just keep quite...It is based on his concern for being forthright in his behavior and ethics of operation...that is a matter of conscience Or is the matter of conscience the principle that honesty requires us to speak our beliefs rather than remain quiet? If so, is that only when one is aware of a danger? Or based on some other criterion?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next