SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis
SOXX 309.40+1.0%Dec 5 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ian@SI who wrote (11690)9/18/2003 4:33:22 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom  Read Replies (3) of 95530
 
Ian, That's right - 6 percent was considered a pretty good number, however, once they found out they could go to 4 percent and not affect inflation, that is the new "benchmark". And of course, with the rising population in this country, in terms of actual numbers, 6 percent now means a lot more people out of work now than then.

I don't know how "experts" in this field of employment look at these numbers. A question I would ask is - as population grows in a country, should the percent unemployment number go down. As an example, if a country has 100M people in the labor market, an unemployment rate of 4 percent means that 4M are out of work(a big number by any measure). How about if the labor market goes to 200M and the unemployment number stays at 4 percent - this means that 8M are now unemployed. Is it reasonable that the unemployment number should go to 2 percent so the number of unemployed stays at 4M?

I don't have any clue as to the right answer.

Don
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext