Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Crimson Ghost who wrote (28117)	9/19/2003 11:01:56 AM
From: lurqer	Read Replies (2) of 89467

They might be better than Bush but not by much IMHO. On foreign policy, I regrettably agree. But there are other considerations for me. It's not just a MIC (Military Industrial Complex) distortion (to the point of grotesque) that bothers me about this Admin. It's an assault on a century of political evolution. This group wants a return to a late nineteenth century Plutocracy. While Clinton was far from an ideal Prez, consider what would have occurred if he hadn't been elected, and the neo-cons had emerged triumphant in a second Bush Sr. Admin. With a significantly larger army, and in the late stages of a secular bull period, their dreams of hegemony could have been carried to much greater extremes, before faltering from a lack of troops and treasure. All, JMO lurqer

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next