SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Bob Brinker: Market Savant & Radio Host
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: sat2000 who wrote (19365)9/19/2003 9:10:29 PM
From: Math Junkie  Read Replies (1) of 42834
 
Since you like tough questions, here are some for you:

Was the BJ Group's involvement with UTEK's 401(k) contingent on his recommending their stock? If so, how do you know this?

How long had the BJ Group been involved with UTEK's 401(k) when he first recommended the stock?

Was the BJ Group still involved in UTEK's 401(k) when he recommended selling the stock?

Which would have meant more to Bob financially, the fact that the BJ Group was an option in UTEK's 401(k), or the fact that he owned the stock at the time of the recommendation?

At the time of Brinker's first UTEK recommendation, how many market gurus were in the practice of revealing that they owned stock in a company they were recommending?

Did Brinker have reason to believe that UTEK was a bad investment when he recommended it?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News