SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : SI vs. iHub - Battle of the Boards Part 2

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: AK2004 who wrote (4928)9/22/2003 12:33:55 AM
From: d:oug  Read Replies (2) of 5315
 
"Doug... You [write] response without [responding]
to any of [Albert's] points."
-
Albert,
These posts between Si & iHub members echo the above,
as a made up e-mail from Sheriff Matt to BobZ :o)
-
"Bob,
iHub members write responses to me without responding
to any of the points I made about these conflicts."
-
What we have here is not a lack of communication skills
between the members engaged in conflicts. Each side
is very aware of the manner the other side will side-step
and ignore points made from the other side that might
lead to an agreement or understanding for compromise.
Each side views the other side as unfit to exist along side
the side they represent, no matter that 99% of those on
their side want peace and an end of fighting such that
all people on both sides can repair and build a better life.
-
Nope, that 1% controls the landscape of Si & iHub on boards
and threads of individual companies having lost between
a major worth, to near all worth.
-
Lets ignore the CFZ (clown free zone) type non stock places
that harbor the best and the brightest humans that missed
the boat and never arrived at expected places of achievement,
so they gather together on these islands to obtain that realization
of greatness in potential, not in service to themselves.
-
These conflicts we are discussing here are connected to:
(copied from above) ... e-mail from Sheriff Matt to BobZ
"Bob,
iHub members write responses to me without responding
to any of the points I made about these conflicts."
ok,
Now lets take this "home" (aka to Si & iHub).
Each day this continues,
the rate of Sheriff Matt's ageing process
is being accelerated such that someday in 2004
Matt will actually be older than his unkle Bob :o)
-
So,
Lets review your reply to me:
-
"You managed to write a lengthy response without really
responding to any of the above 2 points.'
-
Unlike rruff, i do believe you might see that the "thing"
being discussed here, as points by you, rruff, bux etc etc
are NOT legitimate issues based on the WHERE they are
being made. Si & iHub are investment discussions web sites,
and that non investment threads and boards are included
so as to keep the market place mostly on-topic, its as BobZ
mentioned that we are human and carry other interests with us
as we move from one activity to another, and this is reality
and must exist on Si & iHub since it can not be un-existed.
For example, BobZ's interests are part of who he is and is
and will be, always. Bob can leave his Chevy Pony outside
of the office, but the horses power stay in Bob ;o)
-
This is why Matt ages now at a fast rate that causes him
to get on his scooter and spend hours looking for it,
to capture it before it goes too far away from him.
Lucky a few times Matt stopped it before it reached that
old age home for silver donut eaters rest home.
-
Them CFZs are clearly an aberration to the model under
which Silicon Investor was built from. Luckly iHub built in
a defense against such stuff, but Silicon Investor needs
now a combination of Clown Terminator + Expurgator.
-
Nothing bad about clowns, iHub is full of them.
-
So there are the owners of Si & iHub knowing that the
first and last and only concern is to make these sites
do what was intended for, investment folks gather
and talk markets issues for buy-hold-sell, and off topics
placed on them non market boards. No None Not other
stuff of a negative nature like this board is trying to resolve.
Nope, resolve it elsewhere, someplace that was built for
that type of interactions. Si & iHub accepts memberships
with intent to have members add investment content,
and allows off topics threads and boards.
-
Hopefully eventually BobZ and Sheriff Matt will arrive
at an understanding that the points made on this thread
do not belong on this thread, and only arrived here because
the past years of no enforcing the TOU allowed these
bad seeds to be sowed and watered with tears drops
and spit. I say up-root them.
-
If the rruff(s) and anti-Bux types would stop crying over
these very very few people, their tears would stop
and the plants would move their roots off of Si and iHub.
-
Yes Albert, but if rruff wants to grab hold of the roots
of them bad seeded plant growth, then he will be transported
off of Si along with the person who plants hate & anger.
-
Proof in the Pudding
-
I reversed rruff's post to me,
placed his conclusion (aka) Action Item
at the top.
Read it and ask if BobZ (aka Si) is really involved.
-
"... the problem here for the administrator is
1)does he encourage/discourage this type of posting...
2) if so, does he prohibit what might be generally termed
"bigoted" posts as difficult as that may be to define
3) should he "punish" those who are critical of "bigots"
or "bigoted posts." Merely blowing the whistle
and calling it a "personal attack" and missing the rest
of the environment is, IMO, arbitary enforcement."
From: rrufff
I think we have another example here of a poster
who largely supports theses on threads devoted
to "hate," that is, for example that the US is evil,
is controlled by Israel, or there are Jews everywhere,
or conservatives are bad, or all but conservatives
are bad...

- end -
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext