Attack Iraq? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Attack Iraq?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Scott Bergquist who wrote (8094)	9/22/2003 2:20:48 AM
From: AK2004	Read Replies (1) of 8683

I personally would let him go. We will eventually find him and his weapons but there are some more pressing issues than his life 1) France and Germany are uniting Europe against US. Information about WMD would totally discredit France and UN would be forced to provide troops under any US conditions. Europeans would also have to put up some cash 2) Democrats platform right now is mainly Iraq. WMD would evaporate any chances of democrats winning elections and sending us deeper into economic hole. 3) 1/3 of small Belarus is contaminated with radiation so maybe he would get a villa that glows in the dark 4) There are on and off talks between Russia and Belarus of either stronger economic ties or a union similar to US states. If either of this talks would ever to succeed then sadam is a toast. With muslim terror raging in the chechniya russia would unlikely to harbor sadam plus sadam got prior ties to belarus rusnet.nl www2.pravda.com.ua hghltd.yandex.ru

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next