I have simply used your words. I have nothing else to go by in attempting to understand you. I could go back and bring up your words from post after post, but I am not going to bother--at least, not now.
You know what you said. You know you said that women and homosexuals were at higher risk for misconduct than other humans. You even harped on statistics in an attempt to show that women, at least, were at greater risk. And it is that greater risk of misconduct which you have put forth as a rationale for excluding them from treatment from a man...(I.E. the risk, the risk, the risk, the risk, the risk).
You don't remember any of that, of course...
You seem to enjoy saying one thing over and over until the cows come home, and then saying like one TO Prufrock: "No...that is not what I meant, at all." I can't milk these bulls. There are too many mermaids.
You are quite welcome, then, to keep what you "really" mean a deep dark secret. Have fun with your cartoon. |
