"...rather than arguing the points being made.
Points? the points that I lash are "beside the point."
I have argued the nature of the business which is wrought with an unusually high incidence of harmful episodes...you don't seem to be convinced that this is any different than ... a man shopping in the market and seeing the produce girl washing carrots (solon's analogy) ... come on karen, do you really expect me to see this as credible on your part... if so, I am at a total loss. You either see me as very gullible or, you yourself are clueless about the real world. What do you expect?
"I also acknowledged that paternalism contains elements of bigotry, although not intentional nor ugly."
Excuse me. You extrapolated by assumption this "paternalism" from outside the bounds of the argument to qualify your attitude toward mojo. You described it as the worst kind of discrimination. You are on record as hating discrimination more than anything you can imagine or something like that. You declined to respond regarding Myrna. Is she paternalistic too? ...didn't bolter your hatred I guess, so better to dismiss it.
You have seen the venum laden posts ch has been responsible for and have been bolstering him on the side. I seem to remember that part of your persona from way back but thought it was a thing of the past. At least in the past when he would butter you up, to implicate you, he got a little slap on the wrist. ...lacking the slap, you are implicated.
You began by simply dismissing all information that suggested risk of harm. When I posted information that suggested there is harm, that it is serious and of a particularly devastating nature, not relegated to isolated incidents but as many as 70% of therapist have been involved, increasing at alarming rates .... I am called a liar, by you .... Is the problem as serious, pervasive, and harmful as the information I posted suggests? I don't know. Does that make the information useless? Especially if mojo believes the same things the author of that article believes... You seem to have an issue of your own to have responded so strongly...what's up with that? |
