SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Ask God

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Greg or e who wrote (35650)9/22/2003 7:35:29 PM
From: Sidney Reilly  Read Replies (3) of 39621
 
Also the Revelation of John was not until about AD 95. If Jesus returned in AD 70 then it was not a revelation at all. But the Church accepted it as prophetic and John was (already) regarded as a prophet. If Jesus had returned in AD 70 the Church would not have been looking for His return as they must have been in AD 95 when they were regarding John's vision as prophetic.

The Word clearly says that Jesus's body was missing from the tomb. And he was seen and touched by many. He was not a spirit. Thomas touched the wounds. They saw Jesus taken up physically.

What happened in AD 70 was the Romans sacked Jerusalem and dismantled the Temple a stone at a time because they were trying to get all the gold that had melted in the fires and run between the stones. Jesus prophesied there would not be one stone left on another!! I have heard some say when the Romans sacrificed a pig on the Alter that was the abomination of desolation, but it was not. The abomination of desolation is the anti-christ. And he has not been revealed yet.

And there has to be the final process of the mark of the beast. I say process because that's what it is. I have written many posts on the mark and how it is such a perfect judgement by God. I should dig them up.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext