Here's your "physicist" -g-
Message 18465864
Click on past posts to read & remember the exchange.
I watched you on the, I think, thermodynamic thread get into an argument with a physicist about movement without energy, and he became so exasperated with your intransigence that he called you a moron. Thermodynamics hardly arouses personal passion but stupid provocation predictably does.
You are, of course, very wrong. On all counts.
The issue was creation of matter out of nothing, not "movement without energy". The poster in question was no physicist. And he called me "goofy", not "moron" :-) And that only after it became obvious he was cornered and losing face.
Basically, as proof to Creation, he asked the question "Can something appear from nothing?", to which, I replied "Actually, yes, particles are known to appear in vacuum. It is called the 'Casimir Effect'".
The guy is no physicist. He thinks "singularity" is a particle, for God's sake: "I thought particles are supposed to be called singularities? Whatever." siliconinvestor.com
That means a level of education in physics at about 11th grade level (in my high school, we had elementary quantum physics in our last year). Even if he had read Stephen Hawking's "A Brief History of Time", he would know far more.
So, if you needed any more proof that you don't know what you are talking about, here's more.
Oh and that little bit at the end saying "I know you need attention"? That was very weak. Try building an argument next time. And think twice before making up stories about my soi disant "stupid provocation" with "a physicist". |
