SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ild who wrote (261996)9/26/2003 2:02:05 PM
From: ild  Read Replies (1) of 436258
 
Census Bureau Reports Rise
In Poverty, Drop in Income

Associated Press

WASHINGTON -- Poverty rose and income levels declined in 2002 for the second straight year as the nation's economy continued to struggle after the first recession in a decade, the Census Bureau reported Friday.

The poverty rate was 12.1% last year, up from 11.7% in 2001. Nearly 34.6 million people lived in poverty, about 1.7 million more than the previous year.

Median household income declined 1.1% between 2001 and 2002 to $42,409, after accounting for inflation. That means half of all households earned more than that amount, and half earned less.

The poverty rate rose again after falling for nearly a decade to 11.3% in 2000, its lowest level in more than 25 years. Income levels increased through most of the 1990s, then were flat in 2000 and fell the past two years.

Experts had predicted rising unemployment last year and the still shaky economy would increase poverty and lower income for most people, even though the recession officially ended in November 2001.

In 2002, 12.1 million children lived in poverty, or 16.7% of all kids, up from 11.7 million, or 16.3%, the previous year. The Census Bureau said the increase wasn't statistically significant.

The estimates, calculated annually by the Census Bureau, came from a survey of 78,000 households taken in March. They are the government's official measure of income and poverty.

Comparing poverty rates and income for racial and ethnic groups was more difficult in 2002 because the Census Bureau for the first time allowed survey respondents to report if they were of more than one race.

However, the bureau reported the poverty rate increased for blacks and was relatively unchanged for whites, Asians and Hispanics. Median income was highest among non-Hispanic whites and Asians.

The poverty threshold differs by the size and makeup of a household. For instance, a person under 65 living alone in 2002 was considered in poverty if income was $9,359 or less; for a household of three, including one child, it was $14,480.

A separate Census Bureau survey released earlier this month also showed more people living in poverty in 2002, along with a slight increase in median income. However, that survey didn't ask as detailed a series of questions on people's financial status.

Even before the data were made public, House Democrats charged the Bush administration was trying to hide bad economic news by releasing the numbers on a Friday when people are paying more attention to the coming weekend. In previous years, the estimates were released on a Tuesday or Thursday.

"Sounds like they're trying to bury the numbers where people won't find them," said Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D., N.Y.). "This is another clear example of political manipulation of data by the Bush administration to avoid the glare of public scrutiny about the country's worsening economy."

Census Bureau spokesman Larry Neal said the time change wasn't politically motivated. It was originally scheduled to be released Tuesday, he said, but was moved to Friday because statisticians asked for more time to process the numbers.

"These are the official estimates of income and poverty in America, and every debate on income and poverty for the next year will rehash them," Mr. Neal said. "The notion that we should, could or would suppress these numbers doesn't pass the laugh test."
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext