OT FYI Let's also remind women who may face breast cancer...
that radiation "therapy" isn't, and they may later have to deal with other forms of treatment-caused cancer* - liver, bone, brain - should they survive that alleged "cure".(As is the fate of an acquaintance) Less destructive to the immune system but still of questionable efficacy - chemo. I recently spoke to a friend who, diagnosed with breast cancer, has started taking some new "pill" daily and did not, therefore, undergo either chemo or radiation. Her sis is a 13-year survivor who had opted for chemo. An alternative to all that comes from Dr. Loraine Day, who beat breast cancer: www.drday.com Excerpt from a Dr. Day letter: I did refuse chemotherapy, radiation and mutilating surgery because, as a medical doctor with years of experience, I saw thousands of cancer patients die, NOT from their cancer, but from the painful, maiming, destructive "treatments" we doctors give them.
And Yes, I am TOTALLY WELL and Cancer-FREE a full 10 years after my tumor first appeared, and EVERYTHING I used to get well is totally free, except for food....
*New England Journal of Medicine article "Losing the War Against Cancer" May 21 or 29, 1997 stated that a greater percentage of those treated by oncologists for cancer were dying as of that time, then had died from available treatment 20 years earlier. Healthy, nutritional, dairy and sugar-free diet, the article said, is the best prevention. As to expecting a cure from the medical profession...not that promising (that they're looking to kill off their cash cow). The author also noted that those who survived often did so despite and not necessarily because of treatment. |
