SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: tejek who wrote (175434)9/26/2003 7:23:01 PM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) of 1577829
 
Actually they have a lot to do with each other. Even though Saddam had nothing to do with 9/11 as far as we can tell.

Also you seem to be confusing the issues. My statement had little to do with the specifics of attacking Iraq. It was a general statement that could apply in Iraq and also in many other situations including our response to 9/11. I could have used 9/11, or the IRA or Vietnam or the conquests of the Mongols as an example of my point. If I had used the conquests of the Mongols to make my point and also applied the point to 9/11 it would not be saying that Genghis Khan was being 9/11.

Tim
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News