SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Dutch Central Bank Sale Announcement Imminent?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: philv who wrote (19155)9/29/2003 8:06:13 AM
From: sea_urchin  Read Replies (1) of 82028
 
Phil > there has to be consequences to fiscal mismanagement and debt (2)

The opinion of Nobel Prize laureate Joseph Stiglitz:

bday.co.za

>>>We will all feel the ripples from fiscal mess created by Bush

US can only blame itself for spiralling deficits, but in a globalised economy it will sop up much of savings pool.

Meanwhile, the US trade deficit mounts. The US, the world's richest country, evidently cannot live within its means, borrowing more than $1bn a day.

As the US thrashes around for someone to blame, it was inevitable that it would focus on China, with its large trade surplus, just as the twin fiscal and trade deficits of the Reagan era led to a focus on Japan a couple of decades ago.

However, this is blame-shifting, nothing more. The fiscal and trade deficits of the US are both intimately linked. If a country saves less than it invests, it must borrow the difference from abroad, and foreign borrowing and trade deficits are two sides of the same coin.

Globalisation means that mistakes in one country especially in the world's largest economy have powerful repercussions elsewhere.

Three things are worth noting here. First, the US's deficits are certain to sop up vast amounts of the world's pool of savings. But the world will recover eventually from its current slowdown, and that shortage of savings will become important.

It will mean higher real interest rates, lower investment, and lower growth, all of which will be especially costly for developing countries.

Second, the US's huge trade deficit might be a major source of global instability. Will the world continue to finance this deficit willingly, to put its money into a country with such a demonstrated lack of competence in macroeconomic management (to say nothing of the corporate, banking, and accounting scandals)?

Finally, in searching for others to blame, the US may once again enter an era of protectionism, as it did under Reagan.

Equally worrying both for the US and the world is the path on which it has embarked: deficits as far as the eye can see. The Bush administration's policies bode ill for the US in the long run and hence for the world. <<<
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext