SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Galapagos Islands
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (47840)9/29/2003 10:06:23 AM
From: gypsees  Read Replies (1) of 57110
 
I was reading thru a case at the SEC while trying to discover if there were any new proposed changes to the PDT rule.

Part of the judgement against this guy was that he be permanently prohibited from violating a certain rule that was in place. I wonder, does that mean the rest of us can violate it if we want? Sometimes you gotta wonder about these people..lol..

Decided to post the text (bolded relevant section) and link:

PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, plaintiff respectfully requests the Court to enter a final judgment against defendant Bartlett that:

A. Permanently enjoins him from violating Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Exchange Act Rule 10b-5;

B. Orders him to disgorge, with prejudgment interest, all illicit profits realized from the conduct described above;

C. Orders him to pay a civil money penalty pursuant to Exchange Act Section 21A [15 U.S.C. § 78u-1]; and

D. Grants such other and further relief as the Court deems just and appropriate.

Dated: September 24, 2003

sec.gov
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News