SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Sharks in the Septic Tank
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TimF who wrote (76019)10/1/2003 5:13:48 PM
From: epicure  Read Replies (2) of 82486
 
It's all in the perception- and how we slant the fact of the hypothetical. What if mojo is the only masseur around? What if the client can't get to another one? Then it is a huge loss- especially if the person involved is in pain, and needs the massage for medical reasons. You just don't KNOW. And the precedent set by refusing to serve people based on their group is a bad one- so as public policy it is much worse than Auntie K- or one could so argue.

Each client would have individual circumstances- and some of them could be quite compelling- by refusing whole classes of people, our masseur is denying service to possibly very needy clients.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News